Click here to buy secure, speedy, and reliable Web hosting, Cloud hosting, Agency hosting, VPS hosting, Website builder, Business email, Reach email marketing at 20% discount from our Gold Partner Hostinger You can also read 12 Top Reasons to Choose Hostinger’s Best Web Hosting
Looking for free tree testing tools? Here are the best free and freemium options, how to run a valid tree test, sample tasks, metrics to track, recruitment tips, and a ready-to-copy test template. Practical, usable, and linked to tool pages.
Tree testing evaluates how easily people find things in a text-only sitemap. You can run useful tree tests without an expensive subscription — tools like Useberry, UXtweak, Optimal Workshop, UsabiliTree and UXbeam all let you prototype and validate IA quickly. I’ll show which is best for what, a step-by-step test plan, what metrics to watch, and an exportable test template you can use right now.
What is tree testing (quick refresher)?
Tree testing (aka reverse card sorting) is a lightweight usability method where participants try to locate specific items in a plain text hierarchy (a “tree”) — no navigation chrome, no visuals. The method exposes labeling problems and findability gaps early, before you rearrange pages or re-write content. It’s one of the fastest ways to validate an information architecture.
Why use a free tool (and when a paid tool still wins)
Free tools are great for:
Early IA validation (quick iterations)
Small sites and one-off projects
Teaching, demos, and student projects
Paid tools add things free tiers usually limit: panel recruitment, large sample sizes, advanced segmentation, long-term storage, and white-label reports. Start free to validate hypotheses; upgrade only if you need scale or team features.
(Ad)
Best free & freemium tree testing tools
Useberry — Freemium plan; ideal for small projects and teams starting out (free includes limited responses/month). Good UI and quick setup.
UXtweak — Offers tree testing plus a broad set of UX research tools; has free trials and academic offers. Great if you want tree testing plus first-click and session replay later.
Optimal Workshop — The classic Treejack product; full-featured but typically behind a trial or paid plan. Good for rigorous IA research; they often run a 14-day trial.
UsabiliTree — A small, focused free tree testing app built by a developer/researcher — useful for simple tests with no cost.
UXbeam — Another free-focused tree test platform promising fast iterations and panel options for simple tests. Good for rapid IA checks.
(There are more — Maze, Helio, ProvenByUsers and others provide tree testing too — but the five above are the easiest to start with for free or low-cost pilots).
Ever Wondered What Your UX Workflow Is Missing? Meet Google Stitch, Your New Design Sidekick
Which free tool should you pick? — quick guide
Need a few quick responses and an easy UI → Useberry (free tier).
Want a larger UX toolkit and academic pricing → UXtweak.
Want the industry standard for tree tests (trial available) → Optimal Workshop (Treejack).
Running tiny, zero-budget tests → UsabiliTree or UXbeam for true free, simple testing.
How to run a valid tree test
Follow this checklist to get reliable results:
Prepare your tree — export your sitemap or build the IA as a simple hierarchy (homepage → level 1 → level 2…). Tools accept CSV or manual tree builders. (NN/guides recommend spreadsheet prep).
Write 6–12 tasks — realistic find-it tasks (e.g., “You need to cancel a subscription — where would you go?”). Keep tasks short and outcome-focused.
Set success criteria — direct success = user picks the exact correct node; partial = gets to a parent node then picks child.
Recruit participants — 15–30 per round is a sensible target for qualitative confidence; for basic quantitative signals, 30+ is better. Free panels are limited; consider your own users.
Run one round (don’t over-recruit) — run an initial batch, spot obvious failures, iterate labels/branches, then re-test.
Analyze metrics — primary metrics: success rate (task completion), directness (did they go straight), time on task, and common wrong paths (where they dropped). Most free tools show these basics.
Iterate — change labels or structure, then repeat until findability meets your threshold.
Sample tree test task template
Task 1 — “You want to find the company’s refund policy. Where would you look?”
Task 2 — “You need to update your billing info. Where would you go?”
Task 3 — “Find instructions for connecting the app to a smartwatch.”
Use the same plain wording in your chosen tool. Short, realistic, single-goal tasks produce the clearest signals.
Metrics that actually matter (and why)
Success rate (task completion) — proportion who found the target (primary KPI).
Directness (path efficiency) — measures if users needed backtracking or navigation hacks.
Time on task — how long it takes (flag tasks that take unreasonably long).
Common incorrect choices — the “why” behind failures; label changes often fix repeated wrong choices.
Node-level dropoff — where users abandoned — highlights confusing branches.
All the tools above report these basics; paid plans add segmentation, cohort filters, and deeper visuals.
Recruiting participants on a budget
Use your existing users/newsletter/social channels (highest quality).
Ask teammates or friends for initial sanity checks (not final evidence).
For quick learning, some free tools include automatic panel sampling or exchanges — but watch for non-representative samples.
Common pitfalls & how to avoid them
Too many tasks per participant → fatigue and noisy results. Keep sessions under 15 minutes.
Vague tasks → ambiguous wording yields unusable data. Pilot every task with 2–3 people.
Replacing card sorting with tree testing → they answer different questions: card sorting for grouping; tree testing for findability. Use both where appropriate.
Quick tool comparison (one-line cheat sheet)
Useberry — easiest freemium for small projects (limited responses but fast).
UXtweak — research suite with tree tests + other UX methods; good for teams.
Optimal Workshop (Treejack) — industry-grade tree testing; trial available for rigorous IA work.
UsabiliTree / UXbeam — minimal, genuinely free options for quick sanity checks.
FAQs
Q: Are free tree testing tools reliable?
A: Yes — for early validation and label checks. Free tools give the core metrics (success, directness). For large-scale recruitment and advanced segmentation you may need paid tiers.
Q: How many participants do I need for a tree test?
A: Aim for 15–30 per round for directional insights. If you need stronger statistical confidence, 30+ is better.
Q: Can I run tree tests without a tool?
A: You can — using spreadsheets and manual moderation — but tools automate paths, metrics and exports which saves huge time for iteration.
Q: Which free tool is best for students and single-person teams?
A: Useberry or UsabiliTree — both let you get meaningful results with no/low cost.
Now loading...
